LEADERS

International LEADERS Calling Market Crashes Years Ahead
Second to None, Anywhere...

'Warned 2000 tech slide; predicted 2008 meltdown in 2007. Forecasted 2020 global economic collapse in 2011, AND NOW- BY 2050 - THE MOTHER OF ALL CRASHES"

THE #FUTURE #OUTLOOKS - KEY AREAS OF #CONCERN AND #RISK

  Economic and Markets 2023 Outlook WARNING  What Worked for the Past Decades Will Not For The Next WHAT'S COMING - GLOBAL RECESSION? DE...

GLOBAL MARKETS


Live World Indices are powered by Investing.com

Champion, Lead, Inspire

Search This Blog

GREAT BARGAINS; FUN IDEAS

Monday, 21 February 2022

Jeremy #Grantham Makes HUGE #SUPER #BUBBLE Shift to Value #Stocks

 

Editor's Comments:

Sometimes it feels a little spooky - it is as if somebody or something has a bug on our meetings, conversations, and correspondence. Most likely not, but the coincidence in GMO's thinking is remarkable except for one thing  - we would reduce the allocation to stocks even further.

As many of you know we have already called three major corrections since 1999 and are now predicting the biggest collapse ever - by 2050: but no doubt sooner. Why? Well, we won't go into all the details but here are a few of the BIG causes and triggers that are behind our forecast;

Overvalued Meta-Tech stocks that don't make a lot of money or worse. 'The problem with common sense; it is just not so common' - Voltaire

Overextended Federal Debt may cause the US dollar to lose its reserve currency status. Result = hyperinflation- just ask Bosnia, Lebanon, Turkey, Venezuela, et al. This is just poor fiscal and monetary policies - they all suffered the same affliction.

Massive shortages of various agricultural, metal, and mineral commodities, plus fossil fuels that will cause prices to climb dramatically over the next decade putting us on target with the 2040 collapse predicted by MIT in 1972 - ' Limits to Growth.' More inflation.

Climate change and ecocide are going to affect the production of many commodities again adding more pressure to a fragile economic structure. Throw in the growth of populations and migrations to higher consumer-based countries and that too increases demand and thereby prices.

Geo-political situations either have nations scrambling for the last bits and crumbs of natural resources leading to rapid consumption or war of some form. Either way, expect their actions as nations to put more upward pressure on prices.

Cryptocurrencies inherently undermine the value, integrity, and practicality of a sovereign medium of exchange. Think of it this way, today organized tech-savvy crooks are building unlimited sources of digitally branded monopoly money that is being used in exchange for hard assets and services produced by the real economy from concrete resources.

In the end, these snake-oil salesmen can today exchange their pretty digital toilet paper for a new $100,000 Porsche that was made from and by labor and physically depleting concrete objects. The result is obvious - more criminal activity and much higher inflation with lower tax revenues, economic collapse, and loss of reserve currency status. Really stupid.

We could go on a bit more - but the writing is CLEARLY on the wall and the stage is being set for markets and economies crashing 75% or more by 2040 (MITs forecast date)  due to hyperinflation, currency status/value loss, overpopulation, excessive valuations ( caused by Goldylocks interest rates for far too long,) and finally, a massive shortage of all major commodities ranging from peanuts to lithium to fossil fuels that cannot possibly satisfy the basic needs and the food required by an ever-growing population The math does not pencil out.

 What is thus plainly self-evident is - it ain't going to be pretty in the near future.

T A McNeil

CEO Founder
First Financial Insights



Business Insider: GMO trimmed mega-cap tech stocks last quarter as Jeremy Grantham sounded the alarm over a coming market crash


/




Jeremy Grantham


 As Jeremy Grantham continues to warn about the imminent threat of a stock market crash, the asset management firm he co-founded is making trades that partly reflect that view, Business Insider reported.

GMO, which had just over $62 billion in assets under management at the end of 2020, trimmed its stake in mega-cap tech stocks last quarter while it bought more traditional value stocks like AT&T.

But Grantham's resoundingly bearish view on the US stock market doesn't automatically translate to a portfolio that is positioned defensively if a crash actually does occur. That's mostly because GMO offers several different mutual funds that have a specific mandate to follow, and owning stocks is often part of that mandate, 

Business Insider said.GMO reduced Alphabet (GOOG), Pfizer (PFE), Meta Platforms (FB), added to Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM), Discovery (DISCA), AT&T (T), and Vipshop Holdings (VIPS). The asset management firm counts Microsoft as its top holding, followed by Apple, United Health, and Coca-Cola, Business Insider said.

Siow Chen Ming



























































































Sunday, 20 February 2022

Daily #Inspirational#Wisdom #Quotes - February 27, 2022

 

Daily Inspirational Wisdom Quotes

 February 27, 2022





'The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge '

Bertrand Russel













Tuesday, 15 February 2022

Sunday, 13 February 2022

#OPEC #Production Problems Push #Oil Prices Higher

 

OPEC Production Problems Push Oil Prices Higher

Monday, 7 February 2022

Daily #Inspirational #Wisdom Quotes - February 28, 2022

 Daily Inspirational Wisdom Quotes - 

February 28, 2022




If life were predictable it would cease to be life, and be without flavour. 

Eleanor Roosevelt




Sunday, 6 February 2022

The #NFT #Ecosystem Is a Complete #Disaster

 

The #NFT #Ecosystem Is a Complete #Disaster


Top marketplaces facilitate epic amounts of theft and wash trading, scams are rampant, and the cringe is unbearable. Can it last?







For the past year, as NFTs have breached spectacular and speculative heights, we’ve seen a growing amount of skepticism. The most recent wave was touched off by a 138-minute video essay by Canadian media critic Dan Olson that condemned NFTs and other blockchain-based technologies as fundamentally broken and unworkable. In just over a week, it’s garnered more than 3 million views on YouTube. Regardless of your perspective on the video, it’s hard to deny that there’s a lot of bullshit percolating around NFTs. Even hardcore Bitcoiners agree. And despite what the loudest NFT boosters insist, the beatings have continued and morale has not improved. 

Any way you cut it, the NFT ecosystem as it stands is a disaster. 

Take OpenSea, the most popular marketplace for NFTs. Last week, OpenSea suddenly limited the number of times users could mint NFTs for free on its platform because over 80 percent that were created with the tool “were plagiarized works, fake collections, and spam." It reversed that decision within 24 hours, however, after outcry from NFT project developers. In a recent Guardian piece diving into the platform’s struggles with fraud and theft, OpenSea tried to minimize the severity of the problem and claimed it took enforcement action against 3,500 NFT collections every week, or about 0.175 percent of its 2 million total collections. But when nearly all of the NFT collections created for free on the platform are spam or stolen works, one wonders if OpenSea is now caught in an art thievery quagmire of its own making. 

For artists on DeviantArt, which hosts over 500 million pieces of digital art, the problem has gotten so bad that the platform implemented a fraud alert system that scans the Ethereum blockchain for NFT copies of artwork. DeviantArt has issued 80,000 alerts since August 2021, doubling from October to November, then increasing by 300 percent from November to mid-December.

OpenSea’s buzziest competitor, LooksRare, is fraught with another serious problem: wash trading, a normally illegal type of market manipulation that inflates trade volume and value by buying and selling an asset to one’s self or among an organized group. 

LooksRare financially rewards users for their trading volume, which predictably led to people gaming the system. Just this week, it surpassed OpenSea in trade volume thanks to what crypto analytics firm CryptoSlam estimated to be $8.3 billion worth of wash trading―approximately 87 percent of its total trading volume since launching on Jan. 10, Decrypt reported. On Jan. 12, the LooksRare Twitter account retweeted a thread discussing and defending wash trading on the platform, commenting: “Discuss.”

These are not isolated incidents, however. Forms of self-dealing among an elite are also baked into the market and the history of how it got so big in the first place. Take Vignesh Sundaresan, a collector known as “MetaKovan” who purchased the $69 million Beeple NFT that touched off one of the earliest hype cycles around the digital assets. MetaKovan is the financier of Metapurse, a Singapore-based investment firm that earlier this year listed its mission as to "democratize access and ownership to artwork." Metapurse has bought 20 Beeple NFTs, four virtual museums, a soundtrack, and consolidated it all into an "NFT bundle" that offers fractionalized ownership through 10 million B20 tokens. Beeple, as it turns out, happens to be a business partner of MetaKovan and owns 2 percent of all B20 tokens, while MetaKovan owns another 59 percent.

Or consider some of the conclusions of a landmark October study published in Nature analyzing 6.1 million trades encompassing 4.7 million NFTs since 2017: the top ten percent of traders account for nearly 90 percent of all transactions, this group trades 97 percent of all NFTs at least once, and the greatest predictor of any NFT’s value isn’t its appearance but its previous price points. None of this sounds like a functional market so much as a mad grab for profit.

The froth of enthusiasm combined with the market’s weak infrastructure—most projects are run from Discord, a chat platform for video games—has also led to a spectacular amount of scams and hacks targeting investors. NFTs are regularly used to raise money for dubious projects that end in spectacular failures or in a sudden “rug pull” where anonymous founders make off with everyone’s money. The Evolved Apes NFT project raised millions to help develop a fighting game and cover project-related expenses, only for founding developer “Evil Ape” to disappear with $2.7 million. Big Daddy Ape Club’s creators stole $1.3 million worth of tokens on Solana. Blockverse, an unofficial Minecraft NFT project, sold out 10,000 NFTs in a few minutes before its creators disappeared with over $1.2 million worth of tokens.

All of this is just scratching the surface. Besides nefarious developers, NFT buyers have to worry about an unending stream of scammers who, for example, pose as crypto wallet support staff only to drain said wallet and the NFTs inside. Or, if you approve the wrong smart contract, say, on a rather legitimate-looking website set up by thieves—goodbye to your apes. You can get screwed even without a hacker coming for you, if you slip up even a little bit: recently, a bunch of people had their valuable NFTs swept up for dirt cheap because of a flaw in how OpenSea handles listing and re-listing NFTs, and how those listings are broadcast and then fulfilled elsewhere. 




The core problem isn’t the size of the theft or fraud―though these are worrying―because they don’t pose a risk to anyone outside of the crypto community, for now. What is concerning and could lead to the development of systemic issues, however, is that no scandal, exploit, bug, or scam is yet big enough to temper the manic insistence that NFTs represent the future of digital assets and their ownership. If anything, NFTs are being used to propose increasingly more nebulous, abstract, and unwieldy categories of objects and goods and services. 

And as all this develops, we are forced to suffer more obtrusive attempts to entice us: NFT advertisements during the World Series and billboards plastered across major cities; an NFT collection from a former First Lady; Jimmy Fallon and Paris Hilton boosting their Bored Ape NFTs and cryptocurrency payment company MoonPay in a strained advertisement on Fallon’s Tonight Show―which was teased on Twitter earlier that day by MoonPay. All of this and more just to increase the value of a digital asset primarily held by a small group of corporations, celebrities, and wealthy individuals that will enrich them even further.

That there are now multiple projects promising to give you ownership of a color, even promising royalties from every NFT that uses “your” color, shows just how far down the bottom the idea barrel we’re now scraping here. And although boosters will point out that NFT prices in crypto have remained fairly stable even as the price for the underlying asset (ETH) has crashed, that is likely because the underlying price has crashed. It’s a fire sale, low-key. 


This is all a major problem considering how many of the boosters and advocates for NFTs also believe they’ll play an integral role in the coming of “Web3” and the “metaverse”―two nebulously-defined technologies that don’t currently exist, but are so revolutionary in their supposed potential that the real value of NFTs lies in their future role, whatever that is, and the many issues plaguing the space now will somehow disappear.

"NFTs are the bridge to the metaverse, and facilitate identity, community and social experiences in the metaverse," opens one December blog post by Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. In January, a blog post by OpenSea boasted that last year "we saw the world awaken to the idea that NFTs represent the basic building blocks for brand new peer-to-peer economies." NFTs, it goes on to argue, would yield "greater freedom and ownership over digital goods" as well as facilitate the creation of "powerful, interoperable applications." All of this falls in line with Coinbase's own blog scrying the meaning of Web3 and its "defining feature" of ownership: "Web3 gives users full ownership over their content, data, and assets via blockchains. It empowers users to read-write-own."

In a recent essay, tech critic Evgenvy Morozov called Web3 a “territory-free map” that thrived on performativity and self-referencing: "we’ve got this beautiful map on our hands—all that’s missing is the territory it is supposed to refer to." This, combined with how many discussions of Web3 assume its inevitability, conjures vague visions of non-existent blockchain technologies  that are just waiting to be midwifed into reality by VCs, VC-backed projects, and VC-run platforms, is an ominous augur of what’s to come.

This is not to say there aren’t NFT projects out there that are interesting, or at least more rooted in reality. Gaming companies seem intent on giving so-called “play-to-earn” (P2E) gaming (which offers players a way to make money by flipping NFTs) a shot, and the proliferation of P2E games like Axie Infinity that allow individuals to exploit people in the Global South to generate profits they’ll only see a fraction of is both a more familiar and realistic endeavor than most of what fills the NFT space. Unique tokens that signal ownership of a digital good and impose artificial scarcity—something that has until now been frustratingly abundant, for DRM-happy companies—are obviously attractive and also familiar to firms, though what is good for investors is not always good for the public.

It’s also true that the current NFT ecosystem might improve. OpenSea might limit its free minting tool and cut down on the epic amounts of theft. LooksRare’s incentives might change. Hell, a new product might come around and annihilate them both. People may get wise to the Discord scammers, like how we’re all wise to the scam calls constantly blowing up our phones. All of this might just become more normal. 

But should it? As it stands, NFTs are useful primarily for pursuing enclosure: the explicit goal here is to turn every inch of our physical world―and any digital world―into a place where nearly every experience and thing is quantified, commodified, and privatized. As a secondary purpose, NFTs currently facilitate a great deal of fraud, spam, theft, plagiarism, and also allow some retail investors to join in on the gambling typically reserved for the sludge that sits atop the pool of investors. As a tertiary purpose, they confer some benefits to some creators who are lucky, wealthy, or cynical enough to take advantage of them.

Right now, their value is locked up in a dark vision of the future that believers insist will not only inevitably exist but will turn out much better than this one. Most of these grand visions will never come to pass. And yet, if you watched the ridiculous exchange between Paris Hilton and Jimmy Fallon as they showed off their JPEGs on TV and muttered “what the fuck is this” to yourself then you must realize by now that the allure of dizzying profits far exceeds any shame or scorn cast their way. At least, until the profits stop coming.


Saturday, 5 February 2022

Daily #Inspirational Wisdom #Quotes - February 23 ,2022

 Daily Inspirational Wisdom Quotes

February 23, 2022



See All 2022 Inspirations and Wisdom

'What lies behind us and what lies ahead of us are tiny matters compared to what lives in us'

Henry David Thoreau







Wednesday, 2 February 2022

Daily #Inspirational #Wisdom Quotes-- February 24, 2022

 Daily Inspirational Wisdom Quotes

February 24, 2022




See All 2022 Inspirations and Wisdom

There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow men. True nobility lies in being superior to your former self.

- Ernest Hemingway










Popular Posts All Time

Learn, win achieve